Team Services | TFS 2017 | TFS 2015 | TFS 2013
How do you track and manage defects in your code? How do you make sure software problems and customer feedback get addressed in a timely manner to support high-quality software deployments? And, how do you do this while making good progress on new features?
At a minimum, you need a way to capture your software issues, prioritize them, assign them, and track progress. Moreover, you'll want to manage your bugs in ways that align with your Agile practices.
In a nutshell, you manage bugs through the following tasks:
- Capture information using the bug work item type
- Triage bugs by assigning a priority
- Update bug status throughout the bug lifecycle
- Monitor bug assignments and trends.
In addition, you can:
- Capture bugs using test tools
- Configure how your team manages bugs—along with requirements or with tasks
- Define queries and create charts of bug status, assignments, and trends
- Manage duplicate bugs by linking and closing one of them
- Re-run test cases in the web runner using the Verify option
- Automatically capture bugs when using the Test & Feedback extension
- Customize the bug template
- Interface with UserVoice or Zendesk.
You can track bugs in much the same way that you track product backlog items (PBIs) or user stories. Using the bug work item form, you capture the code defect in the Title, Steps to Reproduce, and other fields.
Bug work item form
The bug work item form tracks similar information to the one shown for the Scrum process.
The images you see from your web portal may differ from the images you see in this topic. These differences result from updates made to Team Services or your on-premises TFS, options that you or your admin have enabled, and which process was chosen when creating your team project—Agile, Scrum, or CMMI.
Customize the bug form
You can add fields, change the bug workflow, or customize the bug form. The method you use depends on the process model used by your team project. For details, see Customize the work tracking experience.
Fields specific to bugs
When defining a bug, use these fields to capture both the initial issue and ongoing discoveries made when triaging, investigating, fixing, and closing the bug.
|Steps to Reproduce (friendly name=Repro Steps)||
Capture enough information so that other team members can understand the full impact of the problem as well as whether they have fixed the bug. This includes actions taken to find or reproduce the bug and expected behavior.
Describe the criteria that the team should use to verify whether the code defect is fixed.
Information about the software and system configuration that is relevant to the test.
Provide the criteria to be met before the bug or user story can be closed. Before work begins, describe the customer acceptance criteria as clearly as possible. The acceptance criteria can be used as the basis for acceptance tests so that you can more effectively evaluate whether an item has been satisfactorily completed.
When Test Manager creates bugs, it automatically populates System Info and Found in Build with information about the software environment and build where the bug occurred. To learn more about defining the software environments, see Test different configurations.
When you resolve the bug, use Integrated in Build to indicate the name of the build that incorporates the code that fixes the bug.
On-premises TFS only: To access a drop-down menu of all builds that have been run, you can update the
For information about how to define build names, see build number format options.
A subjective rating of the bug as it relates to the business or customer requirements. Priority indicates the order in which code defects should be fixed. You can specify the following values:
A subjective rating of the impact of a bug on the project or software system. For example: If clicking a remote link (a rare event) causes an application or web page to crash (a severe customer experience), you might specify Severity = 2 - High and Priority = 3. Allowed values and suggested guidelines are:
1 To change the menu selection or pick list, see Customize the work tracking experience. The customization method depends on the process model used by your team project.
Add and review comments made about the work being performed by going to the discussion section.
Use the Discussion section to add and review comments made about the work being performed to resolve the bug. This feature is only available from the new web form.
Capture bugs using test tools
You can create bugs during test sessions using one of the following tools:
- Test & Feedback extension: see Exploratory testing with the Test & Feedback extension
- Test Runner: see Update an existing bug while using Test Runner.
Once you've started coding and testing, you'll want to hold periodic triage meetings to review and prioritize your bugs. How frequently you meet and for how long depends on your situation. Typically, the project owner runs the bug triage meetings, and team leads, business analysts and other stakeholders who can speak about specific project risks attend them.
The project owner can create or open a shared query for new and reopened bugs to generate a list of bugs to be triaged.
Open a shared query or use the query editor to create useful bug queries, such as the following:
- Active bugs by priority (
State <> Doneor
State <> Closed)
- In Progress bugs (
State = Committedor
State = Active)
- Bugs to fix for a target release (
Tags Contains RTM)
- Recent bugs - bugs opened within the last 3 weeks (
Created Date > @Today-21)
Triage mode in query results
From the query results page, you can quickly move up and down within the list of bug work items using the up and down arrows. As you review each bug, you can assign it, add details, or set priority.
Track bugs as requirements or tasks
Many Scrum teams treat bugs the same as any backlog item or user story. Others see bugs as work that belongs to implementing a story, and therefore treat them as a task.
Bugs, like PBIs and user stories, represent work that needs doing. So, should you track your bugs along with other items in the product backlog items or as tasks linked to those backlog items? How does your team estimate work?
Based on how your team answers these questions, they can choose how they want to track bugs from one of these three choices. To change the team setting, see Show bugs on backlogs and boards.
|Bug tracking options||Choose this option|
Bugs appear as part of the product backlog
Bugs appear on backlogs and boards with requirements
When your team or product owner wants to manage bugs similar to requirements. Bugs can be added and prioritize along with PBIs or user stories on the product backlog.
With this option, the team can estimate the effort or story points for bugs which are then included against team velocity and cumulative flow.
Bug backlog is separate from the product backlog
Bugs appear on backlogs and boards with tasks
When your team links bugs to PBIs or user stories, and manages them similar to tasks.
With this option, the team can estimate remaining work for bugs and track progress against the sprint capacity and sprint burndown.
Bugs don't appear on backlogs and boards
When your team manages bugs separate from requirements or tasks, or a different team is tasked with addressing bugs.
Assign bugs to a sprint
Once bugs have been triaged, it's time to assign them to a sprint to get fixed. By addressing a set of bugs to get fixed every sprint, your team can keep the total number of bugs to a reasonable size.
When bugs appear on the product backlog, you can assign bugs to sprints in the same way you do PBIs and user stories during your sprint planning sessions.
When bugs are treated as tasks, they're often automatically linked to a PBI or user story. So, assigning their parent PBI or user story to a sprint will assign the linked bugs to the same sprint as the parent PBI or user story during your sprint planning sessions.
Your team should consider fixing all bugs found during a sprint when testing a feature in development.
Move work items to a sprint from any backlog or board
You can drag any work item from any backlog or board to a sprint. Even when working from the Kanban or task board, you can drag a work item onto a sprint to change it's iteration path.
Feature availability: This feature is supported from Team Services and the web portal for TFS 2015.1 and later versions.
Tips for successful triage meetings:
Fixing bugs represents a trade-off with regards to other work. Use your triage meeting to determine how important fixing each bug is against other priorities related to meeting the project scope, budget, and schedule.
- Establish the team's criteria for evaluating which bugs to fix and how to assign priority and severity. Bugs associated with features of significant value (or significant opportunity cost of delay), or other project risks, should be assigned higher priority and severity. Store your triage criteria with other team documents and update as needed.
- Use your triage criteria to determine which bugs to fix and how to set their State, Priority, Severity, and other fields.
- Adjust your triage criteria based on where you are in your development cycle. Early on, you may decide to fix most of the bugs that you triage. However, later in the cycle, you may raise the triage criteria (or bug bar) to reduce the number of bugs that you need to fix.
- Once you've triaged and prioritized a bug, assign it to a developer for further investigation and to determine how to implement a fix.
Fix, resolve and close bugs (update status)
Bug fixes that involve more than a single section of code may require significant regression testing and may involve other team members. Record any conversations that relate to assessing the risk of bug fixes in the bug work item history.
Bug workflow lifecycle
Once you fix a bug, you should update its workflow State. State choices vary depending on the process you use—Scrum, Agile, or CMMI. The following images illustrate the workflow lifecycle defined for the default bug workflow for the Agile, Scrum, and CMMI processes.
For Scrum bugs, you simply change the State from Committed (similar to Active) to Done. For Agile and CMMI, you first resolve the bug, indicating that the bug has been fixed. Typically, the person who created the bug then verifies the fix and updates the State from Resolved to Closed. If more work has been found after a bug has been resolved or closed, it can be reactivated by setting the State to Committed or Active.
Verify a fix
To verify a fix, a developer or tester should attempt to reproduce the bug and look for additional unexpected behavior. If necessary, they should reactivate the bug.
When verifying a bug resolution, you may find that the bug was not completely fixed or you may disagree with the resolution. In this case, discuss the bug with the person who resolved it, come to an agreement, and possibly reactivate the bug. If you reactivate a bug, include the reasons for reactivating the bug in the bug description.
Verify a bug, re-run tests defined for web apps
Feature availability: The Verify option is available from the bug work item form from Team Services and the web portal for TFS 2017.1 or later versions.
Choose the Verify option to re-run tests which identified the bug. You can invoke the Verify option from the bug work item form context menu to launch the relevant test case in the web runner. Perform your validation using the web runner and update the bug work item directly within the web runner.
To learn more about running test from the web portal, see Run tests for web apps.
Close a bug
You close a bug once it's verified as fixed. However, you may also close a bug for one of these reasons:
- Deferred - deferring a fix until the next product release
- Duplicate - bug has already been reported, you can link each bug with the Duplicate/Duplicate of link type and close one of the bugs
- As Designed - feature works as designed
- Cannot Reproduce - tests prove that the bug can't be reproduced
- Obsolete - the bug's feature is no longer in the product
- Copied to Backlog - a PBI or user story has been opened to track the bug
It's always a good idea to describe any additional details for closing a bug in the Discussion field (new web form) or the History field (old web form) to avoid future confusion as to why the bug was closed.
Monitor bug status, assignments, and trends
You can track the bug status, assignments, and trends using queries which you can then chart and add to a dashboard.
For example, here are two examples showing active bugs by priority trend and a snapshot of bugs by priority.
Pre-defined SQL Server bug reports (on-premises TFS only)
If you work from an on-premises TFS and you have SQL Server Analysis Services and SQL Server Reporting Services configured for your team project, you have access to the following reports (Agile and CMMI processes only).
To learn how to add SQL Server reports for a team project, see Add reports to a team project.
To track your bugs and integrate with other resources available to you, see these topics:
Integrate & Test
Manage your technical debt
Consider managing your bug bar and technical debt as part of your team's overall set of continuous improvement activities. You may find these additional resources of interest:
- Good and Bad Technical Debt (and how TDD helps) by Henrik Kniberg
- Managing Technical Debt posted by Sven Johann & Eberhard Wolff
Tips from the trenches: Agile Bug Management: Not an Oxymoron
by Gregg Boer, Principal Program Manager, Visual Studio Cloud Services at Microsoft
Every Sprint, Address any Known Bug Debt
Every sprint, the team looks at any bugs remaining in the bug backlog and allocates capacity to get that known set of bugs down to zero, or near-zero. Whether this is one day, one week or the entire sprint, they fix the bugs first. Bugs found later, within the sprint, are not considered part of that initial commitment. Unless they're very high priority, they're put on the bug backlog for the next sprint.
Many teams work in a commitment-based organization, where management places a high value on a team's ability to meet their commitments. Doing capacity planning against a known set of bugs makes sprint planning more deterministic, increasing their chance to meet commitments. Any new bugs discovered during the sprint are not a part of the initial commitment, and will be tackled next sprint.>
Managing Bug Debt across an Enterprise
An organization transitioning to a culture where debt is continually eliminated likely is dealing with the following question: How do you get teams to reduce their bug count without telling them exactly what to do? Leadership wants the team to change, yet gives the team autonomy to determine how they change. One option is to use a bug cap.
For example, consider a bug cap of three bugs per engineer. This means a team of 10 people should not have more than 30 bugs in its bug backlog. If the team is over its cap, it's expected to stop work on new features and get under the bug cap. A team is expected to be under its cap at all times, but the team decides how it wants to do that. The bug cap ensures that bug debt is never carried for too long, and the team can learn from the mistakes that causes the bugs to be injected in the first place.
Remember that the bug cap represents the bugs in the bug backlog. It does not include bugs found and fixed within the sprint in which a feature is developed. Those bugs are considered undone work, not debt.
While bugs contribute to technical debt, they may not represent all debt.
Poor software design, poorly written code, or short-term fixes in place of best, well-designed solutions can all contribute to technical debt. Technical debt reflects extra development work that arises from all these problems.
You need to track work to address technical debt as PBIs, user stories, or bugs. To track a team's progress in incurring and addressing technical debt, you'll want to consider how to categorize the work item and the details you want to track. You can add tags to any work item to group it into a category of your choosing.